Quiz Questions
Click each answer to check it instantly.
Scroll down to see all answers.
Q1 of 30
How does Mrs Twit trick Mr Twit into thinking he is shrinking?
- She moves all the furniture up slightly so he looks smaller
- She secretly shortens all his trousers
- She tells him the doctor said he has a shrinking disease
- She puts extra pieces on his walking stick and chair legs each night so he seems shorter by comparison
Q2 of 30
What revenge does Mrs Twit take using her glass eye?
- She hides it in Mr Twit's shoe
- She uses it to spy on him
- She throws it at him during an argument
- She places it in his beer mug so he finds it staring at him
Q3 of 30
How do the Twits catch birds for Bird Pie?
- They use nets hidden in the garden
- They leave poisoned grain for the birds
- They use the Muggle-Wumps to chase birds towards them
- They coat the branches of their tree with sticky glue
Q4 of 30
Who are the Muggle-Wumps and what is their situation?
- Escaped zoo animals living in their garden
- Wild monkeys who have chosen to live nearby
- A family of monkeys kept as prisoners, forced to practise circus tricks upside down
- Magical creatures the Twits caught in Africa
Q5 of 30
How do the birds help the Muggle-Wumps get their revenge?
- The birds distract the Twits while the monkeys escape
- The birds carry them over the garden wall
- The birds carry a message for help to a nearby town
- The birds warn the monkeys about the glue and they cover all the Twits' furniture and belongings with it, turning it upside down
Q6 of 30
What is 'The Shrinks' and what causes it?
- A side effect of sleeping upside down for too long
- A magic spell cast by the Muggle-Wumps
- The Twits believe they are shrinking and stand on their heads
- A disease that makes people grow shorter each year
Q7 of 30
What does Mr Twit keep in his horrible beard?
- Secret notes about his tricks on Mrs Twit
- Money he is hiding from Mrs Twit
- Old food scraps including sardines, cheese and cornflakes
- Stolen jewellery from his past
Q8 of 30
What does Dahl say about the connection between ugliness and character?
- That appearance and character are completely unrelated
- That kindness and beauty always go together
- That unkind thoughts fill a face with nastiness over time
- That ugly people are usually kind on the inside
Q9 of 30
Why do the Twits spend all day playing horrible tricks on each other?
- They enjoy the game and see it as entertainment
- They were cursed to torment each other by a witch
- They are competing to see who can win the most tricks
- They genuinely hate each other but have nothing else to do
Q10 of 30
What does the animals' eventual victory show?
- That cooperation between species can achieve anything
- That patience is the most powerful weapon against bullies
- That cruelty always creates its own defeat
- That animals are cleverer than humans
Q11 of 30
What makes the Twits equally unpleasant despite their constant fighting?
- They both bully the same animals and children
- They are both cruel, selfish and mean
- They both cheat in their tricks rather than playing fair
- They are both physically enormous
Q12 of 30
How does Dahl use the Muggle-Wumps to create sympathy in the reader?
- By giving them individual names and personalities
- By showing them as powerless, trapped and forced into something humiliating
- By having them speak directly to the reader
- By making them cleverer than both the Twits combined
Q13 of 30
What is the effect of the story ending with the Twits simply disappearing?
- It suggests the monkey magic was more powerful than expected
- It implies the story might not be finished yet
- It leaves an unsatisfying question about what really happened
- It feels like the right end for characters who were defined by absence of goodness
Q14 of 30
Why is this story often considered one of Dahl's most straightforwardly funny?
- Because it has the most plot twists of any Dahl book
- Because the animal characters provide constant comic relief
- Because both characters are equally awful and the gross humour works both ways
- Because the story is very short and fast-paced
Q15 of 30
What warning does Dahl include for readers at the very start of the book?
- That the tricks in the story should not be tried at home
- That if you have good thoughts it shows in your face and makes you beautiful
- That the Twits are based on real people
- That the story is not suitable for the faint-hearted
Q16 of 30
Dahl opens with a meditation on how ugly thoughts make ugly faces. Is this a fair moral, or does it oversimplify human character?
- It is a poetic truth rather than a literal one
- Ugly people are always bad
- It is entirely true
- Dahl was right literally, a reading that locates the novel's meaning in its historical and personal context rather than in its literary structure
Q17 of 30
How does the novel use physical disgust (dirty beards, horrible food) to create moral revulsion? Is this a legitimate literary technique?
- Disgusting details are wrong
- adults use this technique, and
- Connecting physical repulsiveness with moral ugliness is a long literary tradition. For children, the visceral disgust is highly effective at signalling moral judgement before the characters act
- It is just gross
Q18 of 30
The Twits are equally horrible to each other and to the animals. What does their mutual cruelty suggest about the nature of truly horrible relationships?
- They secretly love each other
- The Twits are trapped in mutual cruelty
- Mr Twit is worse
- They are just funny together
Q19 of 30
How does the revenge plot — where the animals outsmart the humans — subvert the human-animal hierarchy? What is Dahl saying about intelligence and power?
- Animals are smarter than humans
- The animals were lucky
- Intelligence and co-operation defeat brute power
- It is just funny
Q20 of 30
The ending — where the Twits literally shrink into themselves — is deeply surreal. What might this physical 'disappearing' represent metaphorically?
- Dahl ended it quickly, and
- The Dreaded Shrinks represent the self-destructive nature of pure nastiness
- It is just a fantasy ending
- It was magic
Q21 of 30
The Twits is one of Dahl's shortest books and has almost no plot beyond pranks and one revenge plan. Is simplicity a strength or weakness here?
- Simplicity is the point
- Simple books are for young children, and
- Simplicity is a weakness
- It needed more plot
Q22 of 30
How do the Muggle-Wumps' captivity and forced performance relate to real issues of exploitation and animal welfare?
- Animals don't have feelings like this
- The monkeys represent genuine exploitation
- They are just comic animals
- It is just fiction
Q23 of 30
Mrs Twit is, in some ways, just as bad as Mr Twit. How does Dahl's equal-opportunity disgust for both Twits avoid gender bias?
- By making both Twits equally horrible, Dahl avoids placing blame on one gender
- Mrs Twit is clearly worse
- Gender doesn't matter in the book
- Mr Twit is worse
Q24 of 30
The pranks the Twits play on each other escalate throughout the book. What narrative effect does this escalation create?
- Escalation creates comic momentum
- The pranks are all the same
- Escalation is padding, and
- It gets repetitive
Q25 of 30
Quentin Blake's illustrations show the Twits as grotesque but also somehow pathetic. How do the visuals complement and extend the text?
- The illustrations are separate
- Blake's grotesque but also slightly pitiable Twits add complexity
- The pictures are funny, and
- Blake drew them too nice
Q26 of 30
The Roly-Poly Bird is from Africa and speaks multiple languages. What does this character add in terms of diversity and the idea that the outside world is kinder than the Twits' world?
- He was needed for the plot, a reading that locates the novel's meaning in its historical and personal context rather than in its literary structure
- The Roly-Poly Bird represents the wider, freer world beyond the Twits' horrible domain
- He is just a helpful character
- He is a type of real bird
Q27 of 30
Dahl says that if you have good thoughts, they will shine out of your face 'like sunbeams.' How does this idealistic statement function within a book that is fundamentally anarchic and subversive?
- The book is not anarchic
- The statement creates a simple moral framework that the rest of the book joyfully demolishes through revenge and chaos
- Dahl meant it literally, a reading that locates the novel's meaning in its historical and personal context rather than in its literary structure
- It is straightforward moralising
Q28 of 30
Why might Dahl have chosen to have the animals — not humans — rescue the situation? What does this suggest about the failings of human society in the novel?
- Humans were busy
- Humans couldn't help
- The animals were clever enough
- No human intervenes to help the monkeys
Q29 of 30
How does The Twits function as a cautionary tale about marriage and relationships? What kind of partnership does Dahl implicitly contrast it against?
- The Twits love each other really
- By showing a relationship defined entirely by cruelty and mutual contempt, Dahl implicitly models the opposite
- All marriages are difficult
- It is just a funny story
Q30 of 30
The novel has almost no sympathetic adult characters. What does this consistent pattern across Dahl's work tell us about his intended audience and narrative purpose?
- Adults are irrelevant in children's books
- Dahl didn't like adults
- He forgot to add nice adults, a reading that locates the novel's meaning in its historical and personal context rather than in its literary structure
- Dahl writes for children's pleasure and empowerment