Year 7 • Age 11–12 • 10 questions • Free

The River Runs Deep — Year 7 Reading Comprehension Story

Original story • Comprehension questions • Vocabulary • Parent tips

For Parents and Teachers

This Year 7 reading comprehension is a story of two brothers separated by a flooded river during a camping trip. Written for age 11–12, it develops KS3 reading skills including inference, analysis of language, and evaluation of character, with ten questions at the appropriate level.

The Story: The River Runs Deep

The river had not been like this yesterday.

Yesterday it had been a clear, amber-coloured stream, ankle-deep, the kind you could jump across with a running start. Today it was brown and fast and loud — the overnight rain somewhere upstream had come down and the river had swallowed two extra feet of bank on both sides.

Joel stood on one side. His older brother Marcus stood on the other.

"It must have risen in the night," Marcus shouted over the noise of the water.

"I know," Joel shouted back. He had left camp first, heading to the waterfall, and when he returned the crossing point was gone. He had been standing here for twenty minutes watching the water and thinking.

The problem was straightforward: there were two of them, the tent and the food were on Marcus's side, and the car was a mile and a half in the other direction — on Joel's side. They needed to be together on one of these banks before they could do anything useful.

The second problem, which Joel had not voiced yet, was that Marcus could not swim.

Joel looked at the river. It was fast but not violently so — no white water, no obvious rocks. He was a strong swimmer. The width was perhaps fifteen metres.

"Stay there," he called. "I'm going to swim across."

"No," said Marcus immediately. "No, Joel. You don't know this river."

"I've been watching it for twenty minutes. It's not as bad as it looks."

"You don't know that."

That was true. Joel didn't know that. He knew the surface of the river — the brown water, the speed, the absence of rocks — but he did not know what was underneath. Cold currents. Submerged branches. The way a river that looked manageable could catch you and pull.

He sat down on the bank and thought properly.

He walked upstream. After about four hundred metres he found what he was looking for: a natural ford where the valley narrowed and a line of boulders crossed the water, most of them above the surface, the gaps between them short enough to jump. The water funnelled faster here but it was shallow — knee-deep at most.

He crossed in forty seconds. He didn't get anything wetter than his boots.

When he reached Marcus, his brother was looking at him with an expression that contained, in roughly equal measure, relief and the beginnings of irritation.

"Where did you go?" said Marcus. "You were gone for twenty-five minutes."

"Upstream," said Joel. "I found a crossing."

"You could have just told me."

"I had to find it first," said Joel. "I didn't know it was there."

Marcus picked up his pack. "Smart," he said, very briefly, in a tone that Joel understood meant rather more than it said.

Comprehension Questions

Click each answer to check it. An explanation will appear after each question.

Scroll down to see all the answers.

Question 1 of 10

Why was the river so different on the second day?

  • A dam further upstream had been opened
  • Heavy overnight rain upstream had caused the river level to rise dramatically
  • A storm had hit their campsite directly overnight
  • The river always flooded at that time of year

Question 2 of 10

What was the 'second problem' that Joel had not mentioned?

  • The car was too far away to reach before dark
  • The tent was on the wrong side of the river
  • They had run out of food
  • Marcus could not swim

Question 3 of 10

What does the word 'ford' mean in this story?

  • A shallow crossing point in a river where it can be walked across
  • A deep pool where the current is slowest
  • A narrow bridge across a river
  • A man-made path built to allow safe river crossing

Question 4 of 10

Why does Joel decide not to swim across, despite thinking it 'is not as bad as it looks'?

  • He changes his mind because Marcus tells him not to
  • He realises Marcus is right
  • He is too frightened to enter the water
  • He decides it would take too long

Question 5 of 10

What technique does the author use in the list 'Cold currents. Submerged branches. The way a river...'?

  • A simile comparing the river to something dangerous
  • Personification
  • Repetition to show Joel keeps thinking the same thoughts
  • A list of short phrases that build up the hidden dangers underneath the surface

Question 6 of 10

How long did it take Joel to cross the river at the ford?

  • Forty seconds
  • About four hundred metres' walking time
  • Twenty-five minutes
  • Twenty minutes

Question 7 of 10

What does the phrase 'in a tone that Joel understood meant rather more than it said' suggest about Marcus?

  • Marcus is confused and unable to express himself clearly
  • Marcus is still angry and the word 'smart' is sarcastic
  • Marcus does not want to admit to Joel how impressed or relieved he is, so he keeps his praise minimal
  • Marcus thinks Joel's solution was too simple to deserve much comment

Question 8 of 10

What does Marcus's expression — 'relief and the beginnings of irritation' — tell us?

  • He is happy Joel found a solution but thinks it took too long
  • He is glad Joel is safe but cross that he was kept waiting and worried
  • He is relieved the crossing was safe but irritated by Joel's method
  • He was not really worried and is now just pretending to be relieved

Question 9 of 10

What quality does Joel demonstrate most clearly in this story?

  • Recklessness
  • Leadership
  • Physical bravery
  • Patience and methodical thinking

Question 10 of 10

Why might the author have chosen two brothers as the main characters rather than two strangers?

  • Brothers would be more likely to go camping together
  • The story would not work with strangers as only brothers can find river crossings
  • The sibling relationship allows for a realistic mix of care, irritation and communication that would not exist between strangers
  • Brothers can be relied upon to help each other more than strangers would

Answers

  1. Q1: Heavy overnight rain upstream had caused the river level to rise dramatically
  2. Q2: Marcus could not swim
  3. Q3: A shallow crossing point in a river where it can be walked across
  4. Q4: He realises Marcus is right — he does not know what lies beneath the surface
  5. Q5: A list of short phrases that build up the hidden dangers underneath the surface
  6. Q6: Forty seconds
  7. Q7: Marcus does not want to admit to Joel how impressed or relieved he is, so he keeps his praise minimal
  8. Q8: He is glad Joel is safe but cross that he was kept waiting and worried
  9. Q9: Patience and methodical thinking — he pauses, considers the risks and finds an alternative solution
  10. Q10: The sibling relationship allows for a realistic mix of care, irritation and communication that would not exist between strangers

Vocabulary

Key words from the story, with simple definitions.

ford

A shallow crossing point in a river where it is possible to walk across.

submerged

Hidden under the surface of water; underwater.

funnelled

Narrowed and directed into a smaller channel, making a flow faster and more concentrated.

methodical

Doing things in a careful, orderly and systematic way.

amber

A warm, golden-brown colour — like the resin of trees or clear honey.

voiced

Said out loud; expressed verbally. Joel had not 'voiced' the second problem.

How to Use This Story

Recommended Books

Books your child might enjoy after reading this story.

Hatchet by Gary Paulsen

A gripping survival story about a boy alone in the Canadian wilderness — perfect for readers who enjoyed the problem-solving tension of The River Runs Deep.

The Call of the Wild by Jack London

A classic adventure story for confident KS3 readers interested in wilderness settings and survival.

Holes by Louis Sachar

A witty, layered story about boys at a detention camp — very different in tone but equally effective at building character through action.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this suitable for KS3 English?

Yes. The questions are written at KS3 level, including analysis of language technique, inference and evaluation of character — skills developed in Years 7 and 8.

How should my child approach the technique questions?

Encourage them to name the technique, quote the relevant words, and explain the effect — the PEE (Point, Evidence, Explain) structure used in KS3 and GCSE English.

Is this story long enough for a KS3 comprehension?

The story is at the shorter end of KS3 comprehension texts, but the density of language and the complexity of the questions are appropriate for the level.

More Stories

The New School — Year 7The Apprentice — Year 8 ← All Comprehension Stories